Epidemiology Paper
HIV infection has a wide range of physical implications. Because of the virus’s increased ability to replicate in the human body, the immune system is significantly weakened, leaving a person prone to opportunistic infections. HIV patients frequently get tuberculosis, CMV, and a variety of other opportunistic infections. Tuberculosis is one of the leading causes of death among people living with HIV/AIDS. Additionally, the patients’ poor gastrointestinal health may result in diarrhea. Patients with advanced Kaposi sarcoma or blood vessel wall cancer are diagnosed (Laurencin et al., 2018). Dark purple lesions on the skin and in the mouth are characteristic Kaposi sarcoma signs and symptoms. This sickness is also associated with difficulties with the lungs, digestive system, and other internal organs. Furthermore, lymphomas, which are characterized by enlarged lymph nodes, may occur in HIV/AIDS patients.
Individuals must rely on ARTs to delay the disease’s progression because there is currently no known treatment. Those who consistently take their prescription have a better chance of living for many more years. Poor adherence, on the other hand, has been linked to adverse outcomes in HIV/AIDS patients (Laurencin et al., 2018). Because HIV/AIDS is highly contagious, persons should exercise caution when engaging in sexual activity. Those who are already infected should take their medications as instructed to avoid treatment failures.
HIV/AIDS screening includes testing for antibodies produced against the infection. The disease is reportable, and normally, high-risk populations are involved in the reporting processes. The government’s efforts to combat and eradicate the disease are guided by epidemiological reporting of disease burden by region. Over time, HIV/AIDS management has been characterized by ongoing research efforts and distribution of study findings to the general public and healthcare organizations. Furthermore, because the disease affects the entire world, it is critical to constantly convey the findings of various research studies.
Also Check Out: NRS 451 Benchmark – Effective Approaches in Leadership and Management
Description of the Disease
The widespread of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is with more than 50% of the populations of the African populations. By 2004, the World Health Organization had already estimated that 40 million people were infected with the disease. The disease affects the human immune system making it unable to fight subsequent infections. People with HIV/AIDS are vulnerable to infections. The CD4 cells activate other immune cells in the body to respond against infections. People with HIV infections have low CD4 count and this means that the ability of their body defense mechanisms to respond to infection is highly compromised. The opportunistic infection arises in people with the disease because of their lowered defense mechanism. As a result, antiretroviral therapy (ART) are drugs that help in reducing the multiplication of the virus in the body thus reducing its pathogenicity. HIV is a retrovirus, meaning that it converts its structure from RNA to DNA to multiply in the body. The antiretroviral therapies hinder the ability of the virus to integrate its DNA molecules into the host system and so blocking the lifecycle. Over 35 million individuals diagnosed with HIV reside in resource-limited settings (RLS) (Labrique et al., 2016) use the ARTs. The population of people using ARTs was 17 million in 2016 and this was anticipated to rise to 20 million in 2020. The rate of infectivity and spread of HIV/AIDs reduced with the introduction of ARTs which helps in keeping the viral loads low. However, greater concerns have been on the children who are born with the disease. More than 2.2 million children under the age of 15 years have the virus (Labrique et al., 2016).
Causes, Symptoms, and Mode of Transmission of HIV/AIDS
Sexual contact with infected blood, sperm, or vaginal secretions is the primary route of HIV transmission. The greater the viral load in an infected person, the greater the chance of infection. The World Health Organization (WHO) supports for sexual behaviors that minimize the risk of disease transmission, such as sterilization and sterilized sex. Even drug dealers are at danger of catching the sickness if they use a needle that has been infected with the virus. The transmission of mother-to-child transmission during birth or breastfeeding is of more concern. For the first six months of a child’s life, they should be breastfed exclusively. However, the fact that HIV is intracellular means that it cannot survive outside the body, limiting the chance of the virus being shared through encounters such as swapping glasses with infected individuals. There is also a low chance of transmission by kissing, unless the person has ulcers in their mouth that could allow the virus to enter their body through the mouth.
The virus might express itself in various ways clinically. As long as the virus remains dormant, many people will have flu-like symptoms during the incubation period. Other early indications and symptoms of the disease are an itchy or red skin rash; headache; fatigue; gland swelling; and muscular discomfort. A person’s level of immunity also plays a role in the severity of the symptoms (Laurencin et al., 2018). Two weeks after infection, symptoms begin to emerge. Sero-reversion occurs when the body’s immune system responds to an infection and the virus is eliminated. As a result, infected people may not show symptoms for several years before they resurface. As the disease develops throughout the body, the symptoms become more severe. Skin disorders such as Kaposi’s sarcoma and Cryptococci meningitis may develop in sufferers who have reached an advanced stage. In order to prevent further viral replication, treatment measures must be initiated as soon as the virus is detected. In order to lessen the impact of the disease on society, the CDC advises HIV testing for everyone. Based on the population’s risk classification, the frequency of testing should be adjusted accordingly At the very least, everyone should get screened once every year. In addition, those who have more than one sexual partner should be screened every three months, regardless of their risk level
Write a paper (2,000-2,500 words) in which you apply the concepts of epidemiology and nursing research to a communicable disease. Refer to “Communicable Disease Chain,” “Chain of Infection,” and the CDC website for assistance when completing this assignment.
Topic 2: Epidemiology and Communicable Diseases
Objectives:
- Apply the principles of epidemiology to community health nursing.
- Explain the value of demographic data in community health.
- Apply the epidemiology triangle to a communicable disease occurring at a global level.
- Evaluate the communicable disease chain model.
- Discuss the impact of global health issues on public health systems.
- Explain how social determinants of health contribute to the development of disease.
Communicable Disease Selection
- Chickenpox
- Tuberculosis
- Influenza
- Mononucleosis
- Hepatitis B
- HIV
- Ebola
- Measles
- Polio
- Influenza
Epidemiology Paper Requirements
- Describe the chosen communicable disease, including causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment, and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Is this a reportable disease? If so, provide details about reporting time, whom to report to, etc.
- Describe the social determinants of health and explain how those factors contribute to the development of this disease.
- Discuss the epidemiologic triangle as it relates to the communicable disease you have selected. Include the host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors. Are there any special considerations or notifications for the community, schools, or general population?
- Explain the role of the community health nurse (case finding, reporting, data collection, data analysis, and follow-up) and why demographic data are necessary to the health of the community.
- Identify at least one national agency or organization that addresses the communicable disease chosen and describe how the organizations contribute to resolving or reducing the impact of disease.
- Discuss a global implication of the disease. How is this addressed in other countries or cultures? Is this disease endemic to a particular area? Provide an example.
A minimum of three peer-reviewed or professional references is required.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Resources
Social Determinants of Health
Read “Social Determinants of Health,” from the Healthy People 2030 website.
https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/social-determinants-health
2017 National Notifiable Conditions (Historical)
Explore the 2017 National Notifiable Conditions (Historical) page of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website.
https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/notifiable/2017/
Communicable Disease Chain
Refer to the “Communicable Disease Chain” as needed to complete your assignment.
NRS-428VN-RS2-CommunicableDiseaseChain.doc
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Explore the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) website.
https://www.hhs.gov/
Chain of Infection
Use the media piece “Chain of Infection” to assist you in completing your Topic 2 assignment.
http://lc.gcumedia.com/nsg403c/chain-of-infection/chain-of-infection-v1.1.html
World Health Organization
Explore the World Health Organization (WHO) website.
http://www.who.int/en/
Families USA
Explore the Families USA website.
http://www.familiesusa.org/
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Explore the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website.
https://www.cdc.gov/
Community and Public Health: The Future of Health Care
Read Chapter 2 in Community and Public Health: The Future of Health Care.
https://www.gcumedia.co
Measles
Measles, also referred to as Rubeola, is an acute and highly contagious disease that mainly affects children. Measles is a major cause of child mortality in developing countries. However, measles can affect individuals of all ages. At least 90% of measles secondary infection rates occur in susceptible domestic contacts. This paper discusses measles, including causes, symptoms, transmission, complications, treatment, and demographics, and how social determinants contribute to the disease. The paper will also explore the role of the community health nurse and agencies in addressing measles and the global implication of the disease.
Causes
The Measles virus causes measles. It is a single-stranded, negative-sense enveloped RNA iris belonging to the genus Morbillivirus in the Paramyxoviridae family (WHO, 2019). The virus is highly infectious, and almost all infected persons develop clinical illness.
Symptoms
The symptoms of measles depend on the nutritional status of the patient. The onset of measles symptoms occurs 7-14 days after exposure to the virus (Odei, 2018). The first clinical manifestation is a high fever of above 1040 F that usually lasts for 4-7 days (WHO, 2019). The prodromal phase present is characterized by fever, malaise, anorexia, and the classical triad of conjunctivitis, coryza, and cough (Odei, 2018). The characteristic manifestation of enanthem occurs 2-4 days after the start of the prodromal phase and lasts for 3-5 days, marked by Koplik spots inside the cheeks. Exanthema occurs 1-2 days after the occurrence of Koplik spots and is associates with mild pruritus (WHO, 2019). It is marked by a rash that begins from the face and upper neck and spreads to the extremities, chest, and abdomen after 24 hours. The skin rash in measles is characteristic and matches from one region of the body to another in a systematic pattern.
Uncomplicated measles usually occurs in well-nourished or slightly underweight children. It presents with fever, conjunctivitis, rhinitis, cough, koplik spots, stomatitis, and skin rash (Odei, 2018). On the other hand, complicated measles occurs in malnourished and underweight children. It presents with nasal flaring, tachypnea, dyspnea, hoarse voice, barking cough, inspiratory stridor, skin rash, anorexia, vomiting, diarrhea, keratitis, photophobia, convulsions, and ear discharge.
Mode of Transmission
The Measles virus is transmitted by a sneeze- or cough-produced respiratory droplets. The virus spreads through invisible droplets secreted from the respiratory tract of an infected person. Respiratory droplets remain active and contagious for almost two hours (WHO, 2019). It spreads very easily and fast infecting the skin and the layer of cells that line the lungs, eyes, mouth, throat, and gastrointestinal tract (Odei, 2018). Besides, the measles virus weakens a person’s immune system for many weeks after the onset of the illness, putting one susceptible to other infections.
Complications
Complications of measles occur more in individuals below five years or older than 30 years. Complications occur in various body systems, including the respiratory, neurological, gastrointestinal, eyes, and ear-nose-throat (Odei, 2018). The most common complications of measles are pneumonia, croup, and encephalitis, which are the common cause of measles-related death. Patients also develop gastroenteritis, convulsions, meningitis, conjunctivitis, and otitis media (Odei, 2018). A patient can also develop Xerophthalmia, which is an ophthalmic condition characterized by dryness of the conjunctiva ad cornea.
Treatment
There are no Antiviral drugs available for the treatment of measles. Treatment of measles involves supportive care (WHO, 2019). Persons with uncomplicated measles are usually managed on an outpatient basis, whereas those with complicated measles are treated as inpatients. Supportive management involves maintaining hydration, and replacement of fluids lost through emesis and diarrhea (WHO, 2019). For children, the caregiver should be advised to provide the child with adequate fluids and light, nutritious diet. IV rehydration is given in patients with severe dehydration. Paracetamol is administered to relieve pain and fever. Children with complicated measles should be admitted and be provided with a balanced diet to improve their nutritional status. They should be weighed to assess the nutritional status, and the caregiver should be instructed to bring the child to the clinic daily for follow up.
Vitamin A should be administered to speed up recovery of measles and prevent complications such as Xerophthalmia. The recommended Vitamin A doses for children diagnosed with measles include: Infants below six months should be administered with two doses of 50,000 IU per day; 6-11 months two doses of 100,000 IU per day, and above one year two doses of 200,000 IU per day (Odei, 2018). Besides, children with clinical signs of Vitamin A deficiency should be administered with the first two doses as per the age then a third dose based on the child’s age after 2-4 weeks.
Demographic Of Interest
Malnourished and non-immunized children below three years are at high risk of contracting measles. The severity of measles is related to the viral load one gets from the source. Children who live in overcrowded dwellings and are in close contact with the index case for the whole infective period obtain a high dose of the virus (WHO, 2019). These children develop severe measles with high case fatality rates. Unvaccinated males and females have equal susceptibility rates to infection by the measles virus (WHO, 2019). However, high mortality rates secondary to acute measles has been observed among females. Measles affects people from all racial groups.
Morbidity and mortality rates are high in individuals with malnutrition, immune deficiency disorders, vitamin A deficiency, and inadequate vaccination. Mortality rates are higher among children below five years. The highest mortality rates are among children between 4 to 12 months, and in immunocompromised children due to HIV infection or other conditions (WHO, 2019). Post-exposure prophylaxis with Measles virus vaccine or human immunoglobulin is recommended in unvaccinated persons.
Case Reporting
Immediate reporting of any suspected case of measles is required in the United States (US). Health care providers are required to report the case to the local or state department of health. Since endemic measles transmission has been eliminated in the US, measles cases should be reported within 24 hours by the state health department to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through telephone or e-mail. The state health department should electronically report notifications of confirmed cases to the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS). The US CDC clinical case definition for reporting a susceptible measles case requires the presence of a generalized rash that has lasted for three days or longer; a temperature of 1010F or higher; and presence of cough, conjunctivitis, or coryza (CDC, 2019). When reporting to the CDC, measles cases should be classified as either Suspected, Probable, or Confirmed.
How Social Determinants of Health Contribute to the Development of Measles
Social determinants of health (SDOH) refer to complex conditions in which individuals are born, raised, work, play, worship, and age. SDOH comprises of five key areas, which are health and health Care and Neighborhood, social and community context, economic stability, education, and built environment. Individuals not immunized against measles virus have the highest susceptibility to infection. SDOH has the possibility of affecting measles immunization programs globally (Gastañaduy et al., 2019). Therefore, it is essential to explore the types of SDOH affecting immunization efforts in a country for the state to address them, thus preventing the spread of measles and lower mortality rates.
SDOH, such as housing and community design, contribute to the spread of measles in individuals living in congested areas such as slums. People living in overpopulated areas are likely to be infected with measles since it is airborne, spread very fast, and can result in outbreaks (Rivadeneira, Bassanesi & Fuchs, 2018). Individuals from low-income countries have a high likelihood of contracting measles due to inadequate health care facilities and inconsistent vaccine supply (Rivadeneira, Bassanesi & Fuchs, 2018). Families that travel for long distances to a health facility and those that lack transportation services often fail to take their children for immunization.
Furthermore, access to education opportunities contributes to the development of measles since persons with high education levels understand the importance of immunization. As a result, they adhere to immunization guidelines while individuals with low educational levels fail to take children for vaccination due to ignorance on the importance of vaccination (Rivadeneira, Bassanesi & Fuchs, 2018). SDOH, such as availability of resources to meet daily needs, for example, healthy food, determine the nutritional status of an individual (Rivadeneira, Bassanesi & Fuchs, 2018). Individuals with inadequate access to healthy food often end up malnourished, which makes them susceptible to measles.
The Epidemiologic Triangle As It Relates To Measles
Humans are the only natural hosts of the measles virus with no known animal reservoirs. The virus is this spread from person to person. Host factors that increase the risk of infection include infants with diminished passive antibody before they reach the age of measles immunization (Odei, 2018). An immunocompromised state caused by corticosteroid therapy, HIV/AIDS, alkylating agents, or leukemia despite the immunization status. Besides, host factors such as malnourishment, pregnancy, vitamin A deficiency, and underlying immunodeficiency put one at risk of severe measles and complications (WHO. 2019). Environmental factors that favor the spread of the measles virus include temperate weather during spring and late winter.
Notifications should be done in schools for if a patient is a school-going child since measles is highly contagious. Besides, school-going children are at a high risk since they have not received the second dose of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine (Odei, 2018). It should also be done in the community in situations where no history of contact with a known case can be identified, and if the patient mostly contracted measles from community institutions such as churches.
The Role of the Community Health Nurse and the Importance of Demographic Data in the Health of the Community
The community health nurse (CHN) has the role of conducting case finding by collecting information on the transmission setting such as school or household, the likely source of infection, travel history, and the number of contacts without evidence of immunity (Gastañaduy et al., 2018). The nurse carries out vaccination and recommends quarantine of susceptible contacts without presumptive evidence of immunity. Efforts are also made to establish the source of infection for every confirmed case of measles. The nurse asks the patient or caregiver about contact with other known cases. In cases where no history of contact with a known case can be identified, the nurse identifies opportunities for exposure to unknown cases (CDC, 2019). For instance, exposures may occur in schools, during travel, or through contact with recent travelers or foreign visitors.
The CHN has the role of reporting any suspected, probable, or confirmed case of measles to the state department of health. The CHN provides demographic information, reporting sources including state and county, the clinical symptoms, and the outcome of the case, whether the patient survived or died (CDC, 2019). In addition, the CHN collects information on the number of susceptible individuals with no probable immunity. The nurse then analyzes the data to establish what information is available and what still needs to be collected, referred to as information tracking (Gastañaduy et al., 2018). This is easily achieved by constructing a line listing of cases that enables ready identification of known and unknown data and ensures complete case investigation. Lastly, the CHN follow-up patients and their contacts to assess disease prognosis and evaluate the development of complications.
Demographic data are necessary to the health of a community since it helps identify the population at risk of infection, for example, unvaccinated preschool-age children, patients who visited a particular hospital, or students who have received one dose of measles vaccine. The data also help public health officials identify where measles transmission is occurring or likely to occur. This includes households, daycare, schools, health facilities, churches, and institutions. Furthermore, demographic data helps identify individuals at the highest risk of infection or transmission, such as unvaccinated children, immunocompromised persons, pregnant women, students, health care personnel, or infants below 12 months (Gastañaduy et al., 2018). The data is used to establish the scope of the investigation and the potential for spread. It also guides in identifying appropriate interventions using public health judgment to guide investigation and control efforts.
National agency/ Organization that addresses Measles
The CDC is a health protection agency in the US that addresses measles by helping in reducing the occurrence of the disease and the impact it has on Americans. CDC offers both scientific and technical support to partners and countries in the US and other parts of the world to lower measles and rubella deaths (CDC, 2019). The agency played a vital role in partnership with the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) to create a regional measles elimination strategy in 1996. This contributed to the elimination of measles and rubella in the Western Hemisphere by 2016. It helps reduce the burden of measles by assisting in planning at macro-and micro-levels, implementing, monitoring, and evaluating measles and rubella vaccination campaigns in target areas to eliminate measles and rubella (CDC, 2019). Besides, the CDC conducts operational research to present evidence for recommendations that enhance and guide measles- and rubella-control activities at local, regional, and global levels.
CDC offers technical assistance to undertake measles and rubella outbreak investigations, surveillance reviews, and routine vaccination program evaluations. It also helps develop and strengthen case-based measles-rubella surveillance systems that allow countries to identify, monitor, and promptly respond to measles and rubella infections (CDC, 2019). It serves as the global reference laboratory for measles and rubella and provides resources for national reference laboratories. Besides, the CDC offers technical assistance to global public health laboratories for the collection and transportation of clinical samples for measles testing using real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Global Implication of Measles and How It Is Addressed In Other Countries
Measles affects approximately 30 million children annually in developing countries and causes about a million deaths. It has been associated with 15000 to 60,000 cases of blindness every year globally. Although a safe and cost-effective vaccine is available, there were more than 140,000 measles deaths globally in 2018, primarily among children under the age of five (WHO, 2019). Countries are addressing the issue of Measles by introducing free immunization programs for children. Immunization has been the key public health strategy to lower measles death and eliminate measles. Countries have a routine immunization program that consists of two MMR vaccination doses (Gastañaduy et al., 2018). Countries with high case and death rates conduct mass immunization campaigns in addition to the routine measles-rubella vaccination.
Measles is not endemic in the US, and most cases result from international travel (Gastañaduy et al., 2019). However, Measles remains an endemic disease in many parts of the world, including Europe, Asia, the Middle East, the Americas, and Africa (Gastañaduy et al., 2019). Countries with recent measles outbreaks include Thailand, Israel, Ukraine, Vietnam, Japan, the Philippines, DRC, Liberia, Madagascar, and Somalia.
Conclusion
Measles is a highly contagious disease caused by the Measles virus that spreads from person to person via respiratory droplets. It mostly affects children below five years but can also affect persons of all ages. Individuals highly susceptible to melees include those that are non-immunized, immunocompromised, pregnant, and malnourished. The typical symptoms of measles include fever, koplik spots, conjunctivitis, cough, and coryza. The characteristic rash of measles can be distinguished from other conditions in that it begins from the face and upper necks and then spreads to the trunk, abdomen, and extremities after 24 hours. Measles is associated with severe complications such as convulsions, severe dehydration, pneumonia, croup, and encephalitis. SDOH, such as lack of access to health services, low-income countries, poor housing and neighborhood, and inadequate access to healthy foods, contribute to the development of measles. A CHN has the role of conducting case findings and identifying contact individuals susceptible to developing measles as well as reporting suspected and confirmed cases of Measles to the state department of health. Measles has contributed to high blindness and mortality rates globally, and most countries are addressing this issue through immunization programs.
NRS 428 Epidemiology Paper Assignment
Epidemiology Paper SAMPLE INTRO
Since the beginning of time, populations of the world have been affected by numerous infections and diseases. Some of these ailments have had catastrophic effects on mankind and have threatened the survival of different groups of people. For instance, in the periods of Middle and Dark Ages, plagues were common and this led to mortality of millions of people in Europe (MacNeil et al., 2019). The high incident rates of morbidity and mortality reported during this time prompted scientific research in the field of medicine, which led to the discovery of vaccines and other solutions to combat these diseases. Despite these discoveries, there is always an infection that proves to be a menace to populations in the world. As key players in the field of medicine, nurses are expected to remain abreast with the patterns of disease occurrences to ensure that they provide effective care to patients (Harkness & DeMarco, 2016). Through epidemiology studies, nurses gain understanding on the spread of diseases and gain insights about the current preventive measures aimed at managing or controlling the spread of these ailments. As a case in epidemiology, tuberculosis (TB) provides the basis for this discussion.
According to Crepet et al. (2016), the condition is a major public health concern throughout the world as it competes with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in causing deaths to patients. Since its discovery in 1882, TB has continued to cause misery and death with the vulnerable populations being the hardest hit across the world (Sulis et al., 2014). However, despite a regular declining trend in the incidences of TB over the last decades, new cases and deaths associated with the condition continue to soar when compared with other infectious diseases. As such, there is a need to explore the determinants of health concerning TB and assess the role of community health nurses in controlling the spread of infections. The present study provides a discussion on TB by analyzing the diseases in terms of epidemiologic triangle, the role of nurses in addressing the disease, elaboration of agencies dealing with the ailment and global implication of the disease. NRS 428 Epidemiology Paper Assignment
NRS 428 Epidemiology Paper Assignment RUBRIC
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
HLT-362V HLT-362V-OL191 Epidemiology Paper 150.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) Satisfactory (88.00%) Good (92.00%) Excellent (100.00%)
Content 80.0%
Comprehensive Description of a Communicable Disease and the Demographic of Interest 10.0% Demographic of interest and clinical description are omitted or presented with many inaccuracies. Limited and/or vague summary of demographic of interest and communicable disease is provided. Overview does not offer a clear representation of information necessary for epidemiological study. Overview of the demographic of interest and clinical description of the communicable disease is presented with some inaccuracies of the clinical descriptors. Clinical description of the communicable disease and demographic of interest is provided. Summary is brief but accurate. Overview describing the demographic of interest and clinical description of the communicable disease is presented with a thorough, accurate, and clear overview of all of the clinical descriptors.
Determinants of Health and Explanation of How Determinants Contribute to Disease Development 10.0% Description of the determinants of health and their role in disease development is omitted or presented with many inaccuracies. Paper partially describes the determinants of health in relation to disease development. Paper identifies the determinants of health in relation to the communicable disease selected but does not include an explanation of their role in the development of disease. Paper describes each determinant of health with a comprehensive discussion of their contribution to disease development and progression. Paper comprehensively discusses the determinants of health in relation to the communicable disease, explains their contribution to disease development, and provides evidence to support main points.
Epidemiologic Triangle (Host Factors, Agent Factors, and Environmental Factors 20.0% Description of the epidemiologic triangle is omitted or presented with many inaccuracies. The communicable disease is described with some inaccuracies within the epidemiologic triangle. A visual description of the factors and interaction is not present. The communicable disease is described accurately and clearly within the context of the epidemiologic triangle. The communicable disease is described accurately within the context of the epidemiologic triangle. A brief description of factors and interaction is presented. The communicable disease is described thoroughly, accurately, and clearly within an epidemiological triangle. A visual description of the triangle and how the components of the model interact is included.
Role of the Community Health Nurse and Importance of Demographic Data 20.0% Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is omitted or unclear. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is omitted or unclear. Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is vague, with no integration of case finding, reporting, data collecting, data analysis, or follow-up skills. An incomplete explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is provided. Discussion of the role of the community health nurses is limited, with a brief overview of skills associated with community assessment and planning. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is summarized. Discussion of the role of community health nurse is clear, with a comprehensive description of skills associated with community assessment and planning. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is presented. Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is clear, comprehensive, and inclusive of the community nurse’s responsibilities to primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention through tasks such as case finding, reporting, data collection and analysis, and follow-up. A clear explanation of the importance of demographic data to community health is presented.
National Agency or Organization That Works to Addresses Communicable Disease 10.0% Agency and description of contribution are omitted. An agency or organization is identified, but discussion is vague or inaccurate in relation to the communicable disease chosen. An agency or organization is identified, but discussion regarding efforts to address communicable disease is lacking. An agency or organization is identified, but discussion regarding efforts to address communicable disease is brief. An agency or organization is identified. A clear and accurate description of efforts to address communicable disease is offered. NRS 428 Epidemiology Paper Assignment
Global Implication 10.0% Global implication of the disease is omitted or unclear. A discussion of the global implication of the disease is vague, with no integration of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is not provided. A discussion of the global implication of the disease is limited, with some integration of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided. A discussion of the global implication of the disease is clear, with a comprehensive description of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided. A discussion of the global implication of the disease is clear, comprehensive, and inclusive with a comprehensive description of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
NRS 428 Epidemiology Paper Assignment
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 2.0% Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Explain the role of the community health nurse in partnership with community stakeholders for population health promotion. Explain why it is important to appraise community resources (nonprofit, spiritual/religious, etc.) as part of a community assessment and why these resources are important in population health promotion.
WHO defines Community health as environmental, social and economical resources to. sustain emotional and physical wellbeing among people in ways that advance their aspirations and satisfy their needs in the unique environment. The community health nurse plays a vital role in ensuring community health, partners with community stakeholders and has numerous roles which include integrating community involvement and knowledge about the population with personal, clinical understanding of health and illness and experiences of individuals and families within the population. Evaluating health trends and risk factors of population groups and helping to determine priorities for targeted interventions for example malnutrition, sexually transmitted infections and diabetes mellitus. The nurse provides health education, care management and primary care to individuals and families who are members of a vulnerable population and high risk groups. The nurse assesses and evaluates healthcare services to ensure that people are informed of available programs and services to ensure that people are informed of available programs and services and assisted in the utilization of these services for example screening, therapy and counseling. (Missouri Department of health and senior services, 2020).
It is important to appraise Faith Based Organizations because they important venues for health promotion especially in underserved communities. Religious groups have a moral responsibility toward the wellbeing of the community but they lack the resources to do it alone and therefore may partner with faith based organizations and community stakeholders to achieve this goal. Faith based and religious groups have good understanding of the local context and speak out for underprivileged making them excellent in health promotion. These groups have close links to communities and influence over them and therefore have the ideal opportunity to promote health and address other cultural factors that contribute to ill health and untimely death. (The John Hopkins University 2021).
References
The John Hopkins University. 2021. What is the role of Faith Based Organizations? www.healthcommcapacity.org/what-is-the-role-of-faith-based-organizations
Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services. Public manual .2020. Role of Public Health Nurses. www.health.mo.gov/living/phnroles.php
RESPOND HERE
Hello Sharon,
I agree with you that community health incorporates various resources that sustain emotional and physical wellbeing of the people. Social, environmental, and economic resources. The community health nurse is a crucial person in community health (Osman et al., 2021). Health nurses in conjunction with other stakeholders are mandated multiple obligations within the community. Since the community health nurses are experts their position in the organization allows them to educate the public. When engaging the public health nurses engages various stakeholders based on the nature of the assignment (Sezici et al., 2017). Evaluating health trends and the risk factors of various groups in the community provides data that can be used to tailor the budget of healthcare services (Salerno et al., 2018). It is important to appraise community resources to determine the strength of the community when there is a crisis. Community resources supports the community well-being. Therefore, assessment disclose more information about resources.
References
Osman, W., Ninnoni, J. P., & Anim, M. T. (2021). Use of the nursing process for patient care in a Ghanaian Teaching Hospital: A cross sectional study. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 14, 100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2021.100281
Salerno, J. P., McEwing, E., Matsuda, Y., Gonzalez‐Guarda, R. M., Ogunrinde, O., Azaiza, M., & Williams, J. R. (2018). Evaluation of a nursing student health fair program: Meeting curricular standards and improving community members’ health. Public Health Nursing, 35(5), 450-457. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12402
Sezici, E., Ocakci, A. F., & Kadioglu, H. (2017). Use of play therapy in nursing process: A prospective randomized controlled study. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 49(2), 162-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12277
Epidemiology Paper – Rubric
Criteria Description
Comprehensive Description of a Communicable Disease and the Demographic of Interest
5. Excellent
12.5 points
Overview describing the demographic of interest and clinical description of the communicable disease is presented with a thorough, accurate, and clear overview of all of the clinical descriptors.
4. Good
11.5 points
Clinical description of the communicable disease and demographic of interest is provided. Summary is brief but accurate.
3. Satisfactory
11 points
Overview of the demographic of interest and clinical description of the communicable disease is presented with some inaccuracies of the clinical descriptors.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
10 points
Limited and/or vague summary of demographic of interest and communicable disease is provided. Overview does not offer a clear representation of information necessary for epidemiological study.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Demographic of interest and clinical description are omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.
Criteria Description
Determinants of Health and Explanation of How Determinants Contribute to Disease Development
5. Excellent
12.5 points
Paper comprehensively discusses the determinants of health in relation to the communicable disease, explains their contribution to disease development, and provides evidence to support main points.
4. Good
11.5 points
Paper describes each determinant of health with a comprehensive discussion of their contribution to disease development and progression.
3. Satisfactory
11 points
Paper identifies the determinants of health in relation to the communicable disease selected but does not include an explanation of their role in the development of disease.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
10 points
Paper partially describes the determinants of health in relation to disease development.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Description of the determinants of health and their role in disease development is omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.
Criteria Description
Epidemiologic Triangle (Host Factors, Agent Factors, and Environmental Factors
5. Excellent
25 points
The communicable disease is described thoroughly, accurately, and clearly within an epidemiological triangle. A visual description of the triangle and how the components of the model interact is included.
4. Good
23 points
The communicable disease is described accurately within the context of the epidemiologic triangle. A brief description of factors and interaction is presented.
3. Satisfactory
22 points
The communicable disease is described accurately and clearly within the context of the epidemiologic triangle.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
20 points
The communicable disease is described with some inaccuracies within the epidemiologic triangle. A visual description of the factors and interaction is not present.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Description of the epidemiologic triangle is omitted or presented with many inaccuracies.
Criteria Description
Role of the Community Health Nurse and Importance of Demographic Data
5. Excellent
25 points
Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is clear, comprehensive, and inclusive of the community nurse’s responsibilities to primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention through tasks such as case finding, reporting, data collection and analysis, and follow-up. A clear explanation of the importance of demographic data to community health is presented.
4. Good
23 points
Discussion of the role of community health nurse is clear, with a comprehensive description of skills associated with community assessment and planning. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is presented.
3. Satisfactory
22 points
Discussion of the role of the community health nurses is limited, with a brief overview of skills associated with community assessment and planning. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is summarized.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
20 points
Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is vague, with no integration of case finding, reporting, data collecting, data analysis, or follow-up skills. An incomplete explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is provided.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is omitted or unclear. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is omitted or unclear.
Criteria Description
National Agency or Organization That Works to Addresses Communicable Disease
5. Excellent
12.5 points
An agency or organization is identified. A clear and accurate description of efforts to address communicable disease is offered.
4. Good
11.5 points
An agency or organization is identified, but discussion regarding efforts to address communicable disease is brief.
3. Satisfactory
11 points
An agency or organization is identified, but discussion regarding efforts to address communicable disease is lacking.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
10 points
An agency or organization is identified, but discussion is vague or inaccurate in relation to the communicable disease chosen.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Agency and description of contribution are omitted.
Criteria Description
Global Implication
5. Excellent
12.5 points
A discussion of the global implication of the disease is clear, comprehensive, and inclusive with a comprehensive description of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.
4. Good
11.5 points
A discussion of the global implication of the disease is clear, with a comprehensive description of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.
3. Satisfactory
11 points
A discussion of the global implication of the disease is limited, with some integration of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
10 points
A discussion of the global implication of the disease is vague, with no integration of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is not provided.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Global implication of the disease is omitted or unclear.
Criteria Description
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
5. Excellent
6.25 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
4. Good
5.75 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
3. Satisfactory
5.5 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
Criteria Description
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
5. Excellent
6.25 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
4. Good
5.75 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
5.5 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5 points
Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
Criteria Description
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
5. Excellent
6.25 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.
4. Good
5.75 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
3. Satisfactory
5.5 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5 points
Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
5. Excellent
2.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
4. Good
2.3 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Satisfactory
2.2 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
2 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Excellent
3.75 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Good
3.45 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Satisfactory
3.3 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Assessment Description
Select a global health issue affecting the international health community. Briefly describe the global health issue and its impact on the larger public health care systems (i.e., continents, regions, countries, states, and health departments). Discuss how health care delivery systems work collaboratively to address global health concerns and some of the stakeholders that work on these issues.
Resources within your text covering international/global health, and the websites in the topic materials, will assist you in answering this discussion question.
A global health issue affecting the international health community is cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), especially heart disease and stroke. According to WHO (n.d.), about 17 million people die of heart attacks and strokes every year. Tobacco smoking is the leading cause of these deaths, a risk factor for coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease (n.d.). A sedentary lifestyle and unhealthy eating are also risk factors influencing CVDs.
The total burden of CVDs is illustrated in terms of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost meaning healthy years of life lost. The disease burden in men is 6.8% of DALYs lost due to coronary heart disease and 5% by stroke (World Health Organization, n.d.). In women, the burden is 5.3% DALYs due to coronary heart disease and 5.2% due to stroke (World Health Organization, n.d.). Globally, the health care costs attributed to smoking-related illnesses lead to US$200 billion per year in a net loss. According to the US CDC (2019), more than 859,000 Americans die of CVDs every year. Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the US, while stroke is the fifth leading. The two diseases lead to about $320 billion in health care expenses every year (2019).
The WHO (n.d.) Cardiovascular Program works to bring together organizations that can help prevent these diseases. The World Heart Federation helps people achieve longer and better healthy lives through prevention and control of CVDs in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) (n.d.). In the United States, the CDC Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention (DHDSP) collaborates with the government, public health, health care, and private sectors to improve prevention, detection, and control of CVD risk factors (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019). Countries across the globe have enacted laws that work to reduce smoking through policies like high taxation, bans, smoke-free areas, and health warnings. The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control works to minimize tobacco use in member countries.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). CDC works to prevent heart disease and stroke and promote heart health. https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/publications/factsheets/heart-disease-stroke.htm
World Health Organization. (n.d.). Cardiovascular disease. https://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/resources/atlas/en/
Rubric Criteria
Total 125 points
Criterion | 1. Unsatisfactory | 2. Less Than Satisfactory | 3. Satisfactory | 4. Good | 5. Excellent |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
National Agency or Organization That Works to Addresses Communicable Disease National Agency or Organization That Works to Addresses Communicable Disease | 0 points Agency and description of contribution are omitted. | 10 points An agency or organization is identified, but discussion is vague or inaccurate in relation to the communicable disease chosen. | 11 points An agency or organization is identified, but discussion regarding efforts to address communicable disease is lacking. | 11.5 points An agency or organization is identified, but discussion regarding efforts to address communicable disease is brief. | 12.5 points An agency or organization is identified. A clear and accurate description of efforts to address communicable disease is offered. |
Determinants of Health and Explanation of How Determinants Contribute to Disease Development Determinants of Health and Explanation of How Determinants Contribute to Disease Development | 0 points Description of the determinants of health and their role in disease development is omitted or presented with many inaccuracies. | 10 points Paper partially describes the determinants of health in relation to disease development. | 11 points Paper identifies the determinants of health in relation to the communicable disease selected but does not include an explanation of their role in the development of disease. | 11.5 points Paper describes each determinant of health with a comprehensive discussion of their contribution to disease development and progression. | 12.5 points Paper comprehensively discusses the determinants of health in relation to the communicable disease, explains their contribution to disease development, and provides evidence to support main points. |
Development, Structure, and Conclusion Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development. | 0 points No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered. | 5 points Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose. | 5.5 points Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose. | 5.75 points The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. | 6.25 points The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. |
Evidence Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives. | 0 points Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer. | 5 points Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect. | 5.5 points Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present. | 5.75 points Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used. | 6.25 points Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered. |
Thesis, Position, or Purpose Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience. | 0 points The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident. | 5 points The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience. | 5.5 points The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience. | 5.75 points The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated. | 6.25 points The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience. |
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. | 0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. | 2 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. | 2.2 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. | 2.3 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. | 2.5 points No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. |
Role of the Community Health Nurse and Importance of Demographic Data Role of the Community Health Nurse and Importance of Demographic Data | 0 points Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is omitted or unclear. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is omitted or unclear. | 20 points Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is vague, with no integration of case finding, reporting, data collecting, data analysis, or follow-up skills. An incomplete explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is provided. | 22 points Discussion of the role of the community health nurses is limited, with a brief overview of skills associated with community assessment and planning. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is summarized. | 23 points Discussion of the role of community health nurse is clear, with a comprehensive description of skills associated with community assessment and planning. An explanation of why demographic data are necessary to community health is presented. | 25 points Discussion of the role of the community health nurse is clear, comprehensive, and inclusive of the community nurse’s responsibilities to primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention through tasks such as case finding, reporting, data collection and analysis, and follow-up. A clear explanation of the importance of demographic data to community health is presented. |
Global Implication Global Implication | 0 points Global implication of the disease is omitted or unclear. | 10 points A discussion of the global implication of the disease is vague, with no integration of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is not provided. | 11 points A discussion of the global implication of the disease is limited, with some integration of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided. | 11.5 points A discussion of the global implication of the disease is clear, with a comprehensive description of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided. | 12.5 points A discussion of the global implication of the disease is clear, comprehensive, and inclusive with a comprehensive description of how this is addressed in other countries or cultures and if the disease is endemic to a particular area. An example is provided. |
Epidemiologic Triangle (Host Factors, Agent Factors, and Environmental Factors Epidemiologic Triangle (Host Factors, Agent Factors, and Environmental Factors | 0 points Description of the epidemiologic triangle is omitted or presented with many inaccuracies. | 20 points The communicable disease is described with some inaccuracies within the epidemiologic triangle. A visual description of the factors and interaction is not present. | 22 points The communicable disease is described accurately and clearly within the context of the epidemiologic triangle. | 23 points The communicable disease is described accurately within the context of the epidemiologic triangle. A brief description of factors and interaction is presented. | 25 points The communicable disease is described thoroughly, accurately, and clearly within an epidemiological triangle. A visual description of the triangle and how the components of the model interact is included. |
Comprehensive Description of a Communicable Disease and the Demographic of Interest Comprehensive Description of a Communicable Disease and the Demographic of Interest | 0 points Demographic of interest and clinical description are omitted or presented with many inaccuracies. | 10 points Limited and/or vague summary of demographic of interest and communicable disease is provided. Overview does not offer a clear representation of information necessary for epidemiological study. | 11 points Overview of the demographic of interest and clinical description of the communicable disease is presented with some inaccuracies of the clinical descriptors. | 11.5 points Clinical description of the communicable disease and demographic of interest is provided. Summary is brief but accurate. | 12.5 points Overview describing the demographic of interest and clinical description of the communicable disease is presented with a thorough, accurate, and clear overview of all of the clinical descriptors. |
Format/Documentation Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline. | 0 points Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided. | 3 points Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident. | 3.3 points Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors. | 3.45 points Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors. | 3.75 points No errors in formatting or documentation are present. |