Academic integrity is essential to teaching, learning, and research for MSN students. It entails a continuous process of encouraging a multifaceted network of strategies and responsibilities over the MSN program. Academic integrity gives students and the faculty an opportunity to generate new ideas, knowledge, and creativity while acknowledging other people’s work (Newman, 2020). The purpose of this assignment is to explore the relationship between academic integrity and writing as well as between professional practices and scholarly ethics and discuss how Grammarly, Safe Assign, and paraphrasing promote academic integrity.
Nurse-scholars have a significant obligation to their community as well. Their work must have academic and professional integrity. Their efforts are designed to add to the body of knowledge, advance the profession, and ultimately help in the care of patients. Work that lacks integrity is subject to erode quickly or worse.
Fortunately, there are strategies and tools that can help ensure integrity in academic and professional work. This Assignment asks you to consider these tools and how you might apply them to your own work. NURS 6003 Part 2 Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics
In this Assignment you will continue developing your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan by appending the original document you began in the previous assignment.
To Prepare:
- Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources for this Module in support of academic style, integrity, and scholarly ethics.
- Reflect on the connection between academic and professional integrity.
The Assignment:
Part 2, Section 1: Writing Sample: The Connection Between Academic and Professional Integrity
Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template you began in Module 1, write a 2- to 3-paragraph analysis that includes the following:
- Explanation for the relationship between academic integrity and writing
- Explanation for the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics
- Cite at least two resources that support your arguments, being sure to use proper APA formatting.
- Use Grammarly and SafeAssign to improve the product.
- Explain how Grammarly, Safe Assign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity.
Part 2, Section 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work
Expand on your thoughts from Section 1 by identifying and describing strategies you intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your:
- academic work as a student of the MSN program and
- professional work as a nurse throughout your career. Include a review of resources and approaches you propose to use as a student and a professional.
Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module 1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.
By Day 7 of Week 3
Submit both Section 1 and Section 2 of Part 2.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 3 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 3 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission. NURS 6003 Part 2 Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 3 Assignment Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 3 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 3
To submit your Assignment:
Week 3 Assignment
Practicum Reminder
Practicum Reminder – Important
During your program, you will be required to submit your practicum application. You are responsible for applying on time and for the information that is outlined in the practicum manual. Applications are due the first day of the term before you intend to start practicum. For exact dates and for an overview of the requirements, please review our website.
It is important that you find a suitable preceptor. There is information in the Practicum manual and on our website about the requirements for preceptors. Each course has specific requirements and you are responsible for ensuring your preceptor meet the requirements. If you have questions about preceptor requirements, you may schedule a phone appointment by contacting Field Experience. NURS 6003 Part 2 Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics
Looking Ahead: Practicum Quiz
In Module 5 of this course, you will complete a 10 question quiz about the Practicum requirements for your program. Take some time to familiarize yourself with the Practicum Manual and the Practicum requirements in preparation for the quiz.
Assignment_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part 1: Writing Sample: The Connection Between Academic and Professional Integrity Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template you began, write a 2-3 paragraph analysis that includes the following: · Explanation for the relationship between academic integrity and writing. · Explanation for the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. · Cite at least 2 resources that support your arguments, being sure to use proper APA formatting. · Use Grammarly and SafeAssign to improve the product. · Explain how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity. | Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the relationship between academic integrity and writing. The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. The response accurately cites at least two resources that fully support the arguments explained. The response clearly and accurately describes in detail how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including sufficient evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided. | Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) The response partially describes the relationship between academic integrity and writing. The response partially describes the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. The response partially cites at least two resources that partially support the arguments explained. The response partially describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including some evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided. | Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%) The response vaguely describes the relationship between academic integrity and writing. The response vaguely describesthe relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. The response vaguely or inaccurately cites at least two resources that vaguely support the arguments explained. The response vaguely or inaccurately describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including vague evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%) The response describing the relationship between academic integrity and writing is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The response describing the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The response inaccurately cites at least two resources that inaccurately support the arguments explained, or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including no evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided. | |
Part 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work Expand on your thoughts from Part 1 by: · Identifying and describing strategies you intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your 1) academic work while a student of the MSN program, and 2) professional work as a nurse throughout your career. Include a review of resources and approaches you propose to use as a student and a professional. | Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse. The response clearly reviews and accurately proposes in detail resources and approaches to use as a student and professional. | Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) The response partially identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse. The response partially reviews and proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional. | Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) The response vaguely identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse. The response inaccurately reviews and vaguely proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse, or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately reviews and vaguely proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional, or is missing. | |
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. | Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. | Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | |
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. | Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | |
| Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. | Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. | Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | |
| Total Points: 100 | |||||
