Week 8: Assessment of the Musculoskeletal System

question

Question

NURS 6512 Week 8: Assessment of the Musculoskeletal System

Back Pain

Subjective Data

Back pain can be experienced in various ways, including stinging, muscle spasms, or achy pain (Aish et al., 2021). Back pain is the most common musculoskeletal condition and is often associated with potential or actual tissue damage (Ball et al., 2015). The low back/lumbar spine is a strategic structure of interconnected bones, nerves, ligaments, joints, and muscles that work harmoniously to provide strength, support, and flexibility. The complexity of the structure makes it more vulnerable to repetitive injury, blunt impact, or sudden stress due to lifting or pulling. Below is a list of subjective data of interest.

Chief Complaint: Back pain

Location: Lower back

Onset: One month ago

Character: At times, the pain radiates to his left leg

Duration: Ongoing pain. the health care professional will assess  how long did the pain start

Associated Factors: Will enquire such as headache, chills, and dizziness.

Relieving Factors: Will enquire what alleviates the pain, such as position, or a massage

Severity: I will enquire how bad is the pain using the numeric tool assessment, with “0” being no pain and “10” being the worst pain

Family History: I will enquire; it is very important to ask about the family history. Doing this will help determine if genetics is involved.

Social history: Will inquire about drinking or smoking habits and assess if the patient is taking illicit drugs. Also, the nurse will ask about the kind of work the patient is doing.

Past surgical history: None; I will assess past surgical history

Timing: The healthcare professional will enquire specific time

Was the pain gradual or sudden: I will enquire how the pain started and also assess if the pain is sudden or gradual

Medications: as a nurse practitioner, its important to assess what kind of medication the patient has been taking for the pain and also assess if the medication is working

Endocrine: will enquire

Hematologic: I will assess if the pain has a history of blood clots, bleeding disorders, bone marrow, lymph node and spleen

Also Check Out: Week 7: Assessment of the Heart, Lungs, and Peripheral Vascular System

Objective Data

Physical Assessment:

Vital signs: Key signs to consider in this context include blood pressure, respiration, heart rate, temperature, pulse oximetry, weight, and height.

Neurological: The key metrics to be assessed here entail clearness of speech, vision changes, patient alertness, judgment, and facial drooping.

Lungs/Chest: Examine tachypnea, clearness of bilateral breath sounds, and whether the lungs expand symmetrically.

Skin: Explore the skin paleness, ashen, or cyanosis. Also, look for tainting, tears, and whether the skin is dry/warm.

Musculoskeletal: Examine the evidence of trauma in the affected area, radiation of lower back pain, and the relationship between pain and flexion, twisting, and extension. It is also imperative to assess whether there is reduced mobility due to pain.

Abdomen: Examine key characteristics such as softness, tenderness, presence of bowel sound, and activeness in all four quadrants.

Peripheral vascular/Heart: Here, we shall look at whether the heart rate rhythm is regular, the rate at which capillary refill in all extremities, whether S1 and S2 sounds are heard, and finally, the palpable and strength of peripheral pulses.

Diagnostic Tests:

Assess inflammations makers or infections through blood count.

Check erythrocyte sedimentation rate

Perform HLA-B27 to examine the white blood cells.

Perform MRI of the lumbar spine.

Perform Computerized Tomography (CT) cervical spine.

Perform an X-Ray of the lumbar spine.

Assessment

Differential Diagnosis:

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) is the narrowing of the spinal canal and imposes pressure on the nerve extending from the spinal cord to the muscles (AANS, 2022). It can either be due to congenital abnormalities, primary or acquired, secondary. It is often attributed to degenerative changes in older persons. Degenerative LSS can involve lateral recess, central canal, foramina, or a combination of these locations. Neurogenic claudication is the primary symptom of LSSS and refers to leg symptoms holding the groin, buttock, and anterior thigh. Leg symptoms can comprise heaviness, fatigue, and paresthesia. The symptoms are usually symmetrical, bilateral, or unilateral.

Lumbar Disc Herniation (LDH): It is often referenced in the context of low back pain. The Intervertebral disc comprises the outer Annulus Fibrosus (AF) and inner Nucleus Pulposus (NP). The NP comprises type II collagen, which makes up to 20% of its overall dry weight. It is maintained in the center of the disc by AF, whose concentric type 1 fiber makes up 70% of its dry components. The narrowing of the thecal sac’s space in LDH can be due to extrusion of NP through AF, protrusion of disc through AF, but maintaining continuity with disc space. However, there can also be a complete loss of continuity with the disc space or sequestration of a free fragment. LDH’s common signs and symptoms include sensory abnormalities and radicular pain (Al Qaraghli & De Jesus, 2021). Its predisposing factors include Axial Overloading and dehydration, while 75% is hereditary.

Sciatica: Entails the pain radiating through the sciatic nerve’s path. Sciatica, also known as radiculopathy, is primarily caused by undue pressing on the sciatic nerve. The pressing typically travels via the buttocks and extends to the back of the leg. Persons with sciatica often feel burning low back pain or shock-like impact combined with the pain through the buttocks and down the leg (Ropper & Zafonte, 2015).

Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS): It is a rare lifelong condition deemed a form of arthritis that induces stiffness and pain in the spine. It is also called Bechterew disease and originates from the lower back, and consequently, damage joins in other body parts or extends to the neck. It dominantly leads to inflammation between vertebrae and is more severe in men. Though its cause is unclear, it could be due to genetic and environmental factors (MedlinePlus, 2020).

Lumbar Strain/Sprain (LSS): Occurs when muscle fibers are torn or abnormally stretched. The separation of ligaments from their attachment could be due to gradual overuse or sudden injury. In other words, the lumbar spine relies on soft tissues/lower back muscles to support body weight and is readily torn by excessive stress. The most dominant symptom includes sudden lower back pain (Pilitsis, 2020).

Plan

There are five differential diagnoses for the patient in this context. The next step entails tailoring the effective and appropriate treatment to guarantee quick recovery and sustainable living. Suppose there is a need to treat sciatica; it can be intervened with anti-inflammatories such as narcotics, anti-seizure medication, muscle relaxants, and tricyclic antidepressants. Surgery is an option if there are no improvements after 6-8 weeks (Jensen et al., 2019).

References

Aish, M. A., Abu-Jamie, T. N., & Abu-Naser, S. S. (2021). Lower Back Pain Expert System

Using CLIPS. http://dspace.alazhar.edu.ps/xmlui/handle/123456789/2724

American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), (2022). Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

https://www.aans.org/en/Patients/Neurosurgical-Conditions-and-Treatments/Lumbar-Spinal-Stenosis

Al Qaraghli, M. I., & De Jesus, O. (2021). Lumbar Disc Herniation. In StatPearls 

Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560878/

Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2014). Seidel’s

Guide to Physical Examination-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Jensen, R. K., Kongsted, A., Kjaer, P., & Koes, B. (2019). Diagnosis and treatment of

sciatica. Bmj367. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6273

Pilitsis, J.G, (2020). Low back strain and sprain. American Association of Neurological

Surgeonans.org/en/Patients/Neurosurgical-Conditions-and-Treatments/Low-Back-Strain-and-Sprain#:

Ropper, A. H., & Zafonte, R. D. (2015). Sciatica. New England Journal of

Medicine372(13), 1240-1248. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1410151

The body is continually letting us know how it is doing. Pain is one of the signals that is the easiest to identify. One of the main factors in patients’ severe, ongoing pain is musculoskeletal disorders. The complex network of connecting levers known as the musculoskeletal system gives the body stability and mobility. Finding the reasons of pain might be difficult due to the musculoskeletal system’s interconnectivity. An evaluation approach based on the patient’s medical history and physical examinations is necessary to determine the source of musculoskeletal pain accurately.

Consider case studies that detail unusual results in patients seen in a clinical context in this Discussion.

Note: By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will have given you a specific case study from the list below to discuss. Also, rather of using the standard narrative style for Discussion postings, your Discussion post should be in the Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format. For guidance, use the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template in the Week 5 Learning Resources and Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text. Keep in mind that each patient case contains specific information that is contained in every Episodic/Focused SOAP note.

First Case: Back Pain

A 42-year-old man claims that for the past month, his lower back has been hurting. On sometimes, his left leg feels the agony as well. What nerve roots might be involved in pinpointing the origin of the back discomfort based on your understanding of anatomy? For each of them, how would you test? What more symptoms need to be investigated? What other medical conditions could cause sudden low back pain? Using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) recommendations as a guide, think about the potential causes. Which physical exam will you conduct? What unique actions will you take?

Case 2: Painful ankle

Despite experiencing pain in both of her ankles, a 46-year-old woman is more concerned about her right ankle. Over the weekend, she was playing soccer when she heard a “pop.” Although she can support weight, it hurts. What components of the foot are most likely involved in identifying the source of the ankle pain, based on your understanding of anatomy? What more symptoms need to be investigated? What other medical conditions could cause discomfort in the ankle? Which physical exam will you conduct? What unique actions will you take? If you want to know if you need more testing, should you use the Ottowa ankle rules?

Third case: knee pain

Male teenager age 15 suffers nagging soreness in both knees. A catching sensation under the patella is sometimes described by the patient along with one or both knees clicking. What further background information is required to determine the reasons of the knee pain? What classifications are there for knee pain? What particular differential diagnosis do you have for knee pain? Which physical exam will you conduct? How are you evaluating the anatomical structures as part of the physical examination? What unique actions will you take?

Patient Information:

JD, 15, M, Caucasian

S.

CC: JD complains of dull pain in both knees

HPI: JD is a 15-year-old Caucasian male presents with dull pain in both knees bilaterally and occasional catching/clicking with ambulation. JD reports the pain started 3 weeks ago after he collided with a runner at home plate during a baseball game. JD reports the pain as dull and intermittent on a scale of 5/10. He has not taken anything for the pain at this point. Walking and physical activity make the pain worse and ice/elevation and resting the legs make the pain better. JD reports he has not been able to participate in his baseball games since the injury occurred.

Current Medications: no current medications

Allergies: NKDA, no environmental allergies, no food allergies

PMHx: No previous medical history or surgeries

Soc Hx: Denies the use of cigarettes, denies etoh use, denies use of marijuana and illicit drugs. Freshman in high school, drum major in the band and plays basketball and baseball.

Fam Hx: Mother is 38 y/o with hypertension, Father is 35 with diabetes, Maternal grandmother is living with hypertension and hyperlipidemia, Maternal grandfather is living with hypertension and BPH, Paternal grandmother is living with diabetes and hypertension, Paternal grandfather is living with hyperlipidemia, Sister is 7 years old with no medical issues.

ROS:

Example of Complete ROS:

GENERAL:  Denies weight loss, fever, chills, weakness or fatigue.

HEENT:  Eyes: Denies visual loss, blurred vision, double vision, or yellow sclerae. Ears, Nose, Throat . Denies hearing loss, sneezing, congestion, runny nose or sore throat.

SKIN:  Denies rash or itching.

CARDIOVASCULAR:  Denies chest pain, chest pressure, or chest discomfort. No palpitations or edema.

RESPIRATORY:  Denies shortness of breath, cough, or sputum.

GASTROINTESTINAL:  Denies anorexia, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. No abdominal pain or blood.

GENITOURINARY:  No burning on urination and denies urgency.

NEUROLOGICAL:  Denies headache, dizziness, syncope, paralysis, ataxia, numbness or tingling in the extremities. No change in bowel or bladder control.

MUSCULOSKELETAL:  Reports clicking/catching sensation under bilateral knee caps during ambulation

HEMATOLOGIC:  Denies anemia, bleeding or bruising.

LYMPHATICS:  Denies enlarged nodes. No history of splenectomy.

PSYCHIATRIC:  Denies history of depression or anxiety.

ENDOCRINOLOGIC:  Denies reports of sweating, cold or heat intolerance. No polyuria or polydipsia.

ALLERGIES:  Denies history of asthma, hives, eczema or rhinitis.

O.

General: JD presents alert and oriented, appropriate hygiene, and without gait disturbances

Cardio: S1/S2, no murmurs or adventitious heart sounds heard

Resp: Lung sounds clear throughout lobes bases bilaterally, respirations even and unlabored

Musculoskeletal: Popping sounds heard with flexion of knees bilaterally, ballottement positive bilaterally.

Diagnostic results: Xray of bilateral knees, MRI of knees bilaterally

A.

Differential Diagnoses:

Bursitis: Bursitis is common in individuals who are often in the kneeling or squatting position. The prolonged kneeling causes inflammation of the bursa sac. This patient is a catcher on his baseball team and is squatting for extended periods of time (LeManac et al., 2012). Bursitis presents as pain and swelling in the knee joints exacerbated by the kneeling position.

ACL tear: Due to this patient being active in sports he could have torn his ACL. An ACL tear can present with symptoms such as popping, pain, swelling, and discomfort while walking. ACL tears can happen with a sudden change in directions, quickly slowing down, jumping, and landing wrong (Orthoinfo, 2014).

Patellar Tendonitis: This is reported as pain at the tendon where the patella connects to the tibia. This is common in individuals who participate in jumping activities such as basketball and volleyball players. Also known as “jumper’s knee”. This is caused by tiny tears to the patella tendon from increased stress over time causing weakness and pain to the affected area (Mayo Clinic, 2019). This patient plays basketball in high school and is very active and has high probability of this injury

Patellar fracture: This injury can take place due to blunt force to the affected area. The patient could have fallen on the basketball court or been hit by another player during a baseball game causing trauma to the knee. This presents with the inability to walk or straighten the leg. Severe pain or swelling and oftentimes bruising to the area (Boston Medical Center, n.d.).

Meniscus tear: The meniscus is cartilage that absorbs the impact of fast movements and the shock of body movements. The cartilage can tear with sudden movements or changing of directions. This patient participates in sports that could cause injuries such as this especially basketball. Meniscus injuries present with pain, swelling, locking/catching at the knee joint (John Hopkins Medicine, n.d.).

References

Anterior cruciate Ligament (acl) injuries – OrthoInfo – AAOS. OrthoInfo. (2014). https://orthoinfo.aaos.org/en/diseases–conditions/anterior-cruciate-ligament-acl-injuries/.

Le Manac, h, A. P., Ha, C., Descatha, A., Imbernon, E., & Roquelaure, Y. (2012). Prevalence of knee bursitis in the workforce. Occupational Medicine62(8), 658–660. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs113

Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. (2019, October 16). Patellar tendinitis. Mayo Clinic. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/patellar-tendinitis/symptoms-causes/syc-20376113.

Patellar (Kneecap) Fracture. Boston Medical Center. (n.d.). https://www.bmc.org/patient-care/conditions-we-treat/db/patellar-kneecap-fracture.

Torn meniscus. Johns Hopkins Medicine. (n.d.). https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/torn-meniscus.

Week 8: Assessment of the Musculoskeletal System

A 46-year-old man walks into a doctor’s office complaining of tripping over doorways more frequently. He does not know why. What could be the causes of this condition?

Without the ability to use the complex structure and range of movement afforded by the musculoskeletal system, many of the physical activities individuals enjoy would be curtailed. Maintaining the health of the musculoskeletal system will ensure that patients live a life of full mobility. One of the most basic steps that can be taken to preserve the health of the musculoskeletal system is to perform an assessment.

This week, you will explore how to assess the musculoskeletal system.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Evaluate abnormal musculoskeletal findings
  • Apply concepts, theories, and principles relating to health assessment techniques and diagnoses for the musculoskeletal system

Photo Credit: SCIEPRO/Science Photo Library/Getty Images


Learning Resources-Week 8: Assessment of the Musculoskeletal System

Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

Required Readings

Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2015). Seidel’s guide to physical examination (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

  •  
  • Review of Chapter 4, “Vital Signs and Pain Assessment” (pp. 50-63)
  • Chapter 21, “Musculoskeletal System” (pp. 501-543)This chapter describes the process of assessing the musculoskeletal system. In addition, the authors explore the anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system.

Dains, J. E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. (2016). Advanced health assessment and clinical diagnosis in primary care (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

  •  
  • Chapter 22, “Limb Pain” (pp. 356-374)This chapter outlines how to take a focused history and perform a physical exam to determine the cause of limb pain. It includes a discussion of the most common tests used to assess musculoskeletal disorders.
  • Chapter 24, “Low Back Pain (Acute)” (pp. 288-300)The focus of this chapter is the identification of the causes of lower back pain. It includes suggested physical exams and potential diagnoses.

Sullivan, D. D. (2019). Guide to clinical documentation (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.

  •  
  • Chapter 2, “The Comprehensive History and Physical Exam” (“Muscle Strength Grading”; p. 29)
  • Chapter 4, “Pediatric Preventative Care Visits” (“Documentation of Important Components of Age Specific Physical Exams and Sports Pediatric Sports Participation Physical Exam”; pp. 106-107)

Note: Download this Adult Examination Checklist and Physical Exam Summary: Abdomen to use during your practice musculoskeletal examination.

Seidel, H. M., Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2011). Adult examination checklist: Guide for musculoskeletal assessment. In Mosby’s guide to physical examination (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby. This Adult Examination Checklist: Guide for Musculoskeletal Assessment was published as a companion to Seidel’s guide to physical examination (8th ed.), by Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., & Flynn, J. A. Copyright Elsevier (2015). From https://evolve.elsevier.com/

Seidel, H. M., Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2011). Physical exam summary: Musculoskeletal system. In Mosby’s guide to physical examination (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby. This Musculoskeletal System Physical Exam Summary was published as a companion to Seidel’s guide to physical examination (8th ed.), by Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., & Flynn, J. A. Copyright Elsevier (2015). From https://evolve.elsevier.com/

Katz, J. N., Lyons, N., Wolff, L. S., Silverman, J., Emrani, P., Holt, H. L., & …Losina, E. (2011). Medical decision-making among Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites with chronic back and knee pain: A qualitative study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12(1), 78–85. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. This study examines the medical decision making among Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites. The authors also analyze the preferred information sources used for making decisions in these populations.

University of Virginia. (n.d.). Introduction to radiology: An online interactive tutorial. Retrieved from http://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/courses/rad/index.html. This website provides an introduction to radiology and imaging. For this week, focus on skeletal trauma in musculoskeletal radiology.

Smuck, M., Kao, M., Brar, N., Martinez-Ith, A., Choi, J., & Tomkins-Lane, C. C. (2014). Does physical activity influence the relationship between low back pain and obesity? The Spine Journal, 14(2), 209–216. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.010 Retrieved from the Walden Library Databases.

Shiri, R., Solovieva, S., Husgafvel-Pursiainen, K., Telama, R., Yang, X., Viikari, J., Raitakari, O. T., & Viikari-Juntura, E. (2013). The role of obesity and physical activity in non-specific and radiating low back pain: The Young Finns study. Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism, 42(6), 640–650. doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2012.09.002. Retrieved from the Walden Library Databases.

Required Media – Week 8: Assessment of the Musculoskeletal System

Online media for Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination

In addition to this week’s resources, it is highly recommended that you access and view the resources included with the course text, Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination. Focus on the videos and animations in Chapter 21 that relate to the assessment of the musculoskeletal system. Refer to the Week 4 Learning Resources area for access instructions on https://evolve.elsevier.com/.

Optional Resources FOR Week 8: Assessment of the Musculoskeletal System

LeBlond, R. F., Brown, D. D., & DeGowin, R. L. (2014). DeGowin’s diagnostic examination (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill Medical.

  • Chapter 13, “The Spine, Pelvis, and Extremities” (pp. 585–682)In this chapter, the authors explain the physiology of the spine, pelvis, and extremities. The chapter also describes how to examine the spine, pelvis, and extremities.

To prepare:

With regard to the case study you were assigned:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study.
  • Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study you were assigned.
  • Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
  • Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

Note: Before you submit your initial post, replace the subject line (“Discussion – Week 8”) with “Review of Case Study ___.” Fill in the blank with the number of the case study you were assigned.

By Day 3

Post an episodic/focused note about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned using the episodic/focused note template provided in week 5 resources. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis and justify why you selected each.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days who were assigned different case studies than you. Analyze the possible conditions from your colleagues’ differential diagnoses. Determine which of the conditions you would reject and why. Identify the most likely condition, and justify your reasoning.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 8 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 8 Discussion


Assignment: Assessing the Skin, Hair, Nails, and HEENT

In preparation for the Head-to-Toe Physical Assessment Video due in Week 10, you will videotape yourself conducting an assessment of the skin, hair, nails, and HEENT this week.

To prepare:

  • Arrange an appropriate time and setting with your volunteer “patient” to perform a skin, hair, nails, and HEENT examination.
  • Submit your volunteer’s Video Release form prior to the exam.
  • Download and review the Skin, Hair, and Nails and HEENT rubric provided in this week’s Learning Resources.
  • Ensure that you have the appropriate lighting and equipment to perform the examination.

To complete:

  • Record yourself performing the skin, hair, and nails, and HEENT physical examination. Be sure to cover all of the areas listed in the rubric and to use any equipment appropriately. This Assignment is due by Day 7 of Week 8. Submit your video using the Kaltura Mashup tool accessible through the Assignment submission link provided.

To submit your completed Video Assignment(s), do the following:

If you have not already done so, click on the Week 8 Assignment link. Once you have clicked on the link, click on the Write Submission button to turn on the Content Editor toolbar. Next, fill in the Submission field with any pertinent information. Attach your Assignment file by clicking on the Mashup button on the text editor menu bar and select Kaltura Media. Then find the media file you saved as “WK8Assgn+first initial+last name” and click on Open. Add any appropriate comments pertaining to your Assignment(s) in the Comments field. Be sure to attach all your video assignments. Finally, click on the Submit button to turn in your Assignment(s) for review.

For additional details on using the Kaltura Media mashup tool, please refer to the Kaltura Media Uploader page located in the course navigation menu.

By Day 7

This assignment is due.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 8 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 8 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

To submit your Assignment:

Week 8 Assignment


Assignment 2 (Optional): Practice Assessment: Musculoskeletal Examination

A description of symptoms alone is not enough to form an accurate diagnosis of musculoskeletal conditions. Before forming a diagnosis, advanced practice nurses need to perform a physical examination. Although the musculoskeletal examination is relatively simple, it still needs to be performed multiple times before it can be mastered.

In preparation for the Head-to-Toe Physical Assessment Video due in Week 10, it is recommended that you practice performing a musculoskeletal examination this week.

Note: This is an optional practice physical assessment. You do not have to capture a video of this assessment, as no submission is required.

To prepare:

  • Arrange an appropriate time and setting with your volunteer “patient” to perform a musculoskeletal examination.
  • Download and review the Musculoskeletal Checklist provided in this week’s Learning Resources.

To complete:

  • Perform the musculoskeletal examination. Be sure to cover all of the areas listed in the checklist.

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: NURS_6512_Week_8_Discussion_Rubric

 Outstanding PerformanceExcellent PerformanceCompetent PerformanceProficient PerformanceRoom for Improvement
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Points Range: 44 (44%) – 44 (44%)

Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)

is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

Points Range: 40 (40%) – 43 (43%)

Responds to the discussion question(s)

is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

supported by at least 3 credible references

Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to most of the discussion question(s)

is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

supported by at least 3 credible references

Points Range: 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s)

one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed

is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s)

lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

contains only 1 or no credible references

Main Posting:
Writing

Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Written clearly and concisely

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

Written clearly and concisely

May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Written concisely

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

Written somewhat concisely

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors

Contains some APA formatting errors

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Not written clearly or concisely

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

Main Posting:
Timely and full participation

Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Meets requirements for timely and full participation

posts main discussion by due date

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirement for full participation

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

responds to questions posed by faculty

the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic, may have some depth

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

First Response:
Writing

Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

Response is written in Standard Edited English

Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

Few or no credible sources are cited

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

Response to faculty questions are missing

No credible sources are cited

First Response:
Timely and full participation

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely and full participation

posts by due date

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirement for full participation

Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty

the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic, may have some depth

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

Second Response:
Writing

Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

Response is written in Standard Edited English

Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

Few or no credible sources are cited

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

Response to faculty questions are missing

No credible sources are cited

Second Response:
Timely and full participation

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely and full participation

Posts by due date

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirement for full participation

Total Points: 100 
       

Name: NURS_6512_Week_8_Discussion_Rubric

answer

Answer

Purchase the answer to view it

Place Your Order Now & Ace Your Homework!

Need help with an assignment, essay, or online class?

Order Now!
students
student

Need help with an assignment, essay, or online class?

Order Now!